sex
Are Sports the New Crack?
Tuesday, October 27th, 2009 | Sports | 2 Comments
We have all seen movies where a woman strung out on crack will offer her body to get her fix. The fact that it has become a cliche, to me indicates that crack can become so addictive that people will do anything including giving up your self respect to get the drug.
In the news today, was a story about a woman named Susan Finkelstein who offered to perform a sexual act to get tickets to the World Series. I’m not a big fan of sports but I have been a Yankees fan since I was in grade school. This was partially because I like to win and when I was growing up it was a pretty safe bet to choose the Yankees to win. So I may not be called a fanatic but I am a fan. This being said, I can honestly say that I can’t think of an instance where I would go to extremes to get tickets.
I realize that because of my relative sports inexperience I am not on the cutting edge of sports traditions. I used to think, even in my youth when we are more likely to do foolish things, that those people who would camp out to get tickets were crazy. Now I am reassessing their motives because apparently after you have spent a week camping out without shaving or bathing you can still get laid.
Again, because of my inexperience, I can only assume that there is a list of services for the type of tickets you got. If your seats were behind a pole would you just get a tease, for a nose bleed seat, a hand job? Does this mean that box seats are appropriately named? Was this the etymology of the phrase “Getting to first base”? Is there an S/M meaning for a “walk on balls?”
I am going to continue this next week cause I have more to say
Warren
Noblesse Oblige or Rank Has It’s Privileges?
Tuesday, October 13th, 2009 | Hollywood, US Judicial System | 3 Comments
When the term Noblesse Oblige was first explained to me, the person explaining it gave me the impression that it meant rank has it’s privileges. It bothered me that this didn’t seem to be an accurate translation. While I am no fan of the French language I sought to tranlate it even if I had to deal with the language.
I realized that there is a world of difference between the two. Noblesse oblige implies that nobility demands that you do certain things: like help the poor or feed the hungry; the other implies that the rich get special favors cause they are rich.
This last month the newspapers have been talking about the arrest of Roman Polanski. He was convicted of a crime with an underage girl. Rather than face the punishment, he chose to leave the country. Since that time, he became a fuguitve and recently was captured.
Some of the Hollywood community have been saying that the fact that he has spent 30 years in exile is punishment enough for what he did. I believe that this is wrong. Polanski is considered a very good director and Hollywood seems to be making allowances for him because of that. I have to ask, if he were a cameraman or a key grip, would the Hollywood community still be coming to his defense?
A lot of people in Hollywood feel that because they are artistic, they deserve some special treatment because they are more emotionally involved or because they produce artisitic works. This is creating a class of people that feel superior to the common man. And, in truth, we all are “the common man.” I have a garbage man who collects my garbage every week and the fact that he does it every week and that I haven’t had any problems with him means that hs is doing a good job. If I found out that he was also a child molester, would that give him any special privileges?
I might feel differently if Roman Polanski had sex with a girl who he thought was 18 and later found her to be under age. This was not the case. Roman Polanski drugged the girl, plied her with alcohol, and sodomized her. I think the majority of people would agree that this constitutes rape. He purposely did these things and he should pay the penalty. Art shouldn’t be a “get out of jail free card.”